Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks: A Field Experiment on #EconTwitter
Nicolás Ajzenman, Bruno Ferman, Pedro C. Sant'Anna
This paper documents discrimination in the formation of professional networks among academic economists.
This paper documents discrimination in the formation of professional networks among academic economists. We created 80 bot accounts that claim to be PhD students differing in three characteristics: gender (male or female), race (Black or White), and university affiliation (top- or lower-ranked). The bots randomly followed 6,920 users in the #EconTwitter community. Follow-back rates were 12 percent higher for White students compared to Black students, 21 percent higher for students from top-ranked universities compared to those from lower-ranked institutions, and 25 percent higher for female compared to male students. Notably, the racial gap persists even among students from top-ranked institutions. (JEL A11, C93, I23, J15, J16, Z13)
Authority Figures and the Polarization of Gender Norms
Ali Abboud, Samuel Bazzi, Serena Canaan, Antoine Deeb, Pierre Mouganie
Publicly targeting group identities impacts take-up of educational opportunities
Manuel Munoz
Increasing Degree Attainment among Low-Income Students: The Role of Intensive Advising and College Quality
Andrew Barr, Benjamin Castleman
Should College be “Free”? Evidence on Free College, Early Commitment, and Merit Aid from an Eight-Year Randomized Trial
Douglas N. Harris, Jonathan Mills